Sources before assertions.
How MyDeenPath approaches text accuracy, scholarship, interpretation and corrections.
Preserve primary text
Quran Arabic is reproduced verbatim from Tanzil Uthmani v1.1. Every verse key and text value is checked against the vendored source during the build. English translation is identified separately as Marmaduke Pickthall’s interpretation.
Be clear about review
No MyDeenPath scholar-reviewed answers are published in this release. Reading plans are labelled as source-linked self-guided resources. They are not personal religious rulings. We will identify actual qualified reviewers and their review scope before claiming scholarly approval.
Respect interpretive differences
A passage or individual hadith is not automatically a complete legal ruling. Personal circumstances and scholarly methods matter. Recognised differences should be represented with attribution by qualified contributors.
Publish through an accountable process
Original religious guidance must pass research review, scholarly review, translation review where relevant, and editorial checks. Publication records must identify the source, reviewer, date and permitted use. Changes should leave a revision trail.
Keep AI within its role
AI assisted the interface, code and draft reading-plan copy. It did not generate the Arabic Quran or rewrite the English translation. No AI religious-answer assistant is enabled. Any future assistant must retrieve from approved sources, cite them and be evaluated before release.
Correct openly
Suspected errors should identify the page, reference and supporting source. Sacred text changes require comparison to the upstream edition, not an unverified manual rewrite.